Biden claims ‘climate change’ is a bigger threat than nukes as he pushes closer

When you need people to give you money or vote for you, the best option is to scare them into doing so, and Nebulous Boogieman is the gift that keeps on giving.

This week President Biden leaned into scaremongering in a speech in New York touting his infrastructure bill, claiming that the end of the world as we know it is just one more herd of cows and gas-guzzling cars away. And those cow hides are more dangerous than 10,000 nuclear missiles primed and ready to fire at a moment’s notice.

Ironically, he spends almost every weekend jetting from one vacation spot to another in his gas-powered helicopter and motorcade. But when you’re the most powerful grumpy old man on the planet who has to arrange for your Federal Bureau of Investigation to search for classified documents, how else do you get?

not kidding

President Biden told the New Yorkers this week that:

“Global warming is the single most existential threat to humanity we have ever faced, along with nuclear weapons.”

Digest that comment for a second. NATO tanks are rolling towards Russia. It is not out of bounds to say that World War III could break out at a moment’s notice.

RELATED: Top 5 World Economic Forum Moments That Prove Elite View 1984 as ‘How To’ Guide

Then, earlier this month, when he visited California, he dropped this gem:

“If anyone doubts that the climate is changing, they must have been asleep for the last few years.”

Bold words coming from a man known as Sleepy Joe. But he wasn’t singing that tune when he was in New York just four months ago.

Real threat

Just last October, Sleepy Joe Biden claimed:

“For the first time since the Cuban Missile Crisis, we have the threat of nuclear weapons if things actually go their way.”

What ‘thing’ is Biden referring to? Why, the ongoing proxy war with Russia, of course.

And how is he trying to mitigate this impending nuclear threat? Accelerating the way things are going – giving Ukraine equipment we previously said we would never do, such as tanks and possibly F-16s.

Even the Bulletin of Nuclear Scientists thinks we are on the brink of planetary destruction. They recently moved the Doomsday Clock forward 90 seconds to midnight, largely due to the threat of nuclear war with Russia.

As CEO of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Rachel Bronson explains:

“We live in times of unprecedented peril…”

Indeed, but is it because of a possible nuclear apocalypse, or because my husband likes to cook on a gas-fired stove?

RELATED: Now that West has promised tanks, Ukraine cancels F-16 request

Climate Soldier

It’s not new for politicians to say what they need to say, whether they believe it or not, to get people to give them cash or votes. However, it still never ceases to amaze me how far we, the voters, have let this little gimmick go.

In 2021, Biden told an audience of Air Force members:

“When I went to the tanks in the Pentagon with President Obama as first vice president-elect, the military sat us down and told us that the biggest threats facing America were the biggest physical threats. It’s not funny. Did you know that the Joint Chiefs told us that the greatest physical threat America faced was? Global Warming.”

We should not put too much stock in what the Joint Chiefs say; They too were blindsided by the complete and utter collapse of Afghan forces and thought that Ukraine would fold like a bad hand in poker 72 hours after Russia invaded.

So instead of agonizing over military tactics, the art of war and professions of arms, the Army has since contracted for ‘climate literacy’ courses and a ‘Climate 101’ course for its soldiers.

The Secretary of the Army has a surprisingly ironic goal:

“…get all our tanks and combat vehicles electric within the next few decades.”

I can tell you from personal experience that I saw very few electric vehicle plugs when I was deployed. But perhaps a better question would be, how do we charge these bad boys if any number of the 12,700 nuclear warheads take away most of the planet’s life and energy sources?

RELATED: America Pushes Doomsday Clock to 90 Seconds to Midnight for Last Time

by number

I enjoy science and numbers, so let’s see something, shall we? Climate change fanatics love to argue that increased climate disasters prove that global warming is a threat and will kill us all.

However, the numbers don’t back that up. Ecologist Björn Lomborg explains:

“A century ago, storms, floods, droughts, wildfires and extreme temperatures killed an average of half a million people each year. Over the next 10 decades, global annual deaths from this cause fell by 96% to 18,000. In 2020, they are down to 14,000.

Well, geez, it seems strange…how is it that we survive climate catastrophe better now than in the past? Could it be due to advances in technology and living standards of civilization?

Few things pose a more significant existential threat to our nation and planet than Mother Nature. Our adversaries are actively sending poison into our country that could kill every man, woman, and child in America.

Just think, last year more than 50 million fentanyl-laced counterfeit prescription pills came through our borders. This is what I call an attempted biological attack.

Over 90% of the planet’s nuclear warheads are owned by us and Russia, which has threatened to dial up the conflict in Ukraine on a regular basis. A full nuclear exchange would destroy the entire world.

Climate change culture has yet to prove that global warming will completely wipe out the planet. So don’t buy what scaremongers are trying to sell you. Instead of investing in solar panels for your home, you may be better served looking for fallout shelters and radiation pills.

Now is the time to support and share your sources of faith.
Ranked #3 on FeedSpot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites” by The Political Insider.